The Impact of Modular Learning on Student Comprehension, Motivation, and Skill Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48094/raudhah.v10i1.855الكلمات المفتاحية:
Modular learning, student motivation, cognitive development, psychomotor skills, self-regulated learning, project-based education.الملخص
This study explores the impact of modular learning on Grade 10–12 students at Temasek Independent School using a qualitative descriptive approach through semi-structured interviews. Findings show that focusing on fewer subjects improves comprehension, though challenges like inconsistent scheduling and poor module selection can reduce motivation and self-confidence. Psychologically, students who selected modules based on personal interests showed greater motivation and autonomy, while others experienced disengagement. Project-based learning supported life skill development, particularly in time management, problem-solving, and collaboration. Despite structural inefficiencies, students used adaptive strategies such as self-regulated planning and teacher consultations to manage the system. The study emphasizes the importance of refining modern, flexible learning models to better support student engagement, autonomy, and overall growth.
Keywords: Modular learning, student motivation, cognitive development, psychomotor skills, self-regulated learning, project-based education
المراجع
Bernardo, A. S., & Ramos, M. C. (2020). Effectiveness of modular learning approach in developing self-directed learning skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(2), 78–84.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, 403.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn, 58.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press.
Dave, R. H. (1970). Psychomotor Levels. In Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives, 20–21.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence, 352.
Harrow, A. (1972). A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain, 190-191
Hassan, A., Rosli, D. I., & Zulkifli, Z. (2019). Modular Approach and Its Impact on Students' Learning Motivation. International Journal of Instruction.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka Documentation.
Kurniawati, Sandra et al. (2014). Education in Indonesia: A White Paper. Brookings Institution.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning, 57–84.
Nugroho, A., & Suryani, D. (2022). Student Engagement in Modular Distance Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran.
Pekrun, R. (2006). The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions. Educational Psychology Review, 317.
Piaget, J. (1973). To Understand is to Invent: The Future of Education. Grossman Publishers.
Pratiwi, & Marhaeni. (2021). Curriculum Reform and Student-Centered Learning in Indonesia. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia).
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications, 433.
Subekti, L. (2022). Modular Learning: An Effective Strategy for Indonesian Schools. Journal of Educational Development.
Suryadarma, D., & Jones, G. W. (2013). Education in Indonesia: A Snapshot. ISEAS.
Tan, O. S. (2003). Problem-Based Learning Innovation: Using Problems to Power Learning in the 21st Century.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.
Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles Derived from the Study of Simple Skills Do Not Generalize to Complex Skill Learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2025 Mohammad Rashif Qinthara Sihotang, Mitha Nur Salsabila, Yuma Yudhayana

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





.png)
